Moto G 5G (2023) Review: Far Too Little for Far Too Much
On paper, the Moto G 5G (2023) looks like it could be a decent $250 smartphone. It boasts 5G connectivity, a large display, and a respectable camera setup. However, once you actually get your hands on it and start using it, you quickly realize that it falls short in several key areas. In this review, we’ll take a closer look at the Moto G 5G (2023) and explain why it may not be worth the price tag.
Underwhelming Performance
- The Moto G 5G (2023) is powered by a mid-range Qualcomm Snapdragon processor, which should be sufficient for everyday tasks and casual gaming. However, in reality, the device often stutters and lags, especially when multitasking or running demanding apps.
- The device only comes with 4GB of RAM, which is disappointing considering its price point. This limited amount of RAM impacts the overall performance of the phone, making it slower and less responsive compared to other smartphones in the same price range.
- Although the Moto G 5G (2023) claims to offer 5G connectivity, the actual experience falls short. The device struggles to maintain a consistent and reliable 5G connection, often reverting back to 4G or even 3G. This can be frustrating, especially for users who specifically chose this device for its 5G capabilities.
Mediocre Display and Design
- The Moto G 5G (2023) features a 6.7-inch IPS LCD display, which should provide a decent viewing experience. However, the display quality is rather underwhelming. Colors appear washed out, and the resolution is not as sharp as expected. This becomes especially noticeable when watching videos or playing games with vibrant graphics.
- In terms of design, the Moto G 5G (2023) looks like a generic mid-range smartphone. While it is not necessarily a bad thing, it lacks any standout features or unique design elements. It feels rather bland and uninspired when compared to other smartphones in its price range that offer more premium and stylish designs.
Inferior Camera Performance
- The Moto G 5G (2023) boasts a triple-camera setup, including a 48MP primary camera, an 8MP ultra-wide lens, and a 2MP depth sensor. On paper, this seems like a promising camera system. However, in practice, the camera performance is far from impressive.
- The primary camera captures photos with average detail and lacks sharpness. The images often appear soft and lack the vibrancy and dynamic range seen in photos taken with competing smartphones in the same price range.
- The ultra-wide lens also disappoints, producing images with noticeable distortions and a lack of detail. Low-light photography is also problematic, with the Moto G 5G (2023) struggling to capture well-exposed and noise-free images.
Underwhelming Battery Life
- With a 5000mAh battery, one would expect the Moto G 5G (2023) to offer impressive battery performance. However, in reality, the battery life is rather underwhelming.
- The device struggles to last through a full day of heavy usage, requiring frequent charging. Even with moderate use, the battery drains faster than expected, leaving users constantly reaching for their chargers.
- Considering the Moto G 5G (2023)’s price point and its claim of 5G support, the underwhelming battery life is a significant drawback. Users will likely find themselves needing to recharge their phones more frequently, especially if they are actively using 5G connectivity.
Overall, the Moto G 5G (2023) falls short in several key areas, making it difficult to recommend. The underwhelming performance, mediocre display, inferior camera system, and lackluster battery life all contribute to its disappointing user experience. While the device may have appeared promising on paper, its real-world performance leaves much to be desired. If you’re in the market for a mid-range smartphone with 5G capabilities, there are better options available that offer a better overall package at a similar price point.
Main Takeaway
The Moto G 5G (2023) fails to live up to its promising specifications on paper. With underwhelming performance, mediocre display quality, inferior camera performance, and disappointing battery life, it falls short in several important areas. For the price point, there are